Home > Archives (2006 on) > 2009 > April 2009 > Letter to PM on Binayak Sen‘s Incarceration
Mainstream, Vol XLVII No 19, April 25, 2009
Letter to PM on Binayak Sen‘s Incarceration
Sunday 26 April 2009, by
#socialtagsThe following is the text of a letter written by Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, the former Supreme Court Judge, to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, dated April 17, 2009.
I would like to bring to your attention a case of grave injustice which is a cause of much shame to Indian democracy: that of Dr Binayak Sen, the well-known paediatrician and defender of human rights.
This good doctor has been incarcerated in a Raipur jail for nearly two years now uner the Chhattisgarh State Public Security Act, 2005. Among the charges against Dr Sen, who is renowned worldwide for his public health work among the rural poor, are “treason and waging war against the state†.
Chhattisgarh State prosecutors claim that Binayak, as part of an unproven conspiracy, passed on a set of letters from Narayan Sanyal, a senior Maoist leader who is in the Raipur jail, to Piyush Guha, a local businessman with allegedly close links to the Left-wing extremists. He was supposed to have done this while visiting Sanyal in prison both in his capacity as a human rights activist and as a doctor treating him for various medical ailments.
The trial of Dr Sen, which began in a Raipur Sessions Court late April 2008, has, however, not thrown up even a shred of evidence to justify any of these charges against him. By March 2009, of the 83 witnesses listed for deposition by the prosecution as part of the original charge-sheet, 16 were dropped by the prosecutors themselves and six declared ‘hostile’, while 61 others have deposed without corroborating any of the accusations against Dr Sen. Irrespective of the merits of the case against Dr Sen, there are very disturbing aspects to the way the trial process has been carried out so far.
As if all this were not enough, Dr Sen has also been repeatedly denied bail by the Bilaspur High Court (in September 2007 and December 2008). And the Supreme Court of India rejected his special leave petition to have the bail application heard before it (in December 2007).
Given the paucity of evidence in the trial of Dr Sen so far, in all fairness the Raipur court should have dismissed the case against him altogether by now. Certainly the weakness of the prosecution’s position should entitle him to at least grant of bail. Dr Sen is a person of international standing and reputation, with a record of impeccable behaviour throughout his distinguished career. In May 2008, in an unprecedented move, 22 Nobel Prize winners even signed a public statement calling him a ‘professional colleague’ and asking for his release.
¨
Normally bail is refused only in cases where courts believe an accused can tamper with evidence, prejudice witnesses or run away. In Dr Sen’s case none of these apply, as shown by the simple fact that at the time of his arrest he chose to come to the Chhattisgarh Police voluntarily and made no attempt to abscond despite knowing about his possible detention.
Today Dr Sen, a diabetic who is also hypertensive, is himself in urgent need of medical treatment for his deteriorating heart condition. In recent weeks his health has worsened and a doctor appointed by the court to examine him recommended that he be transferred to Vellore for an angiography and perhaps, if needed, an angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft without further delay.
Instead of recognising their social contributions, the Indian state, by wrongly branding Dr Sen and many other human rights defenders like him as ‘terrorists’, is making a complete mockery of not just democratic norms and fair governance but its entire anti-terrorist strategy and operations.
The repeated denial of bail which results in ‘punishment by trial’ constitutes an even graver threat to Indian society. The sheer injustice involved will only breed cynicism among ordinary citizens about the credibility and efficacy of Indian democracy itself.
(Courtesy: The Hindu)