Mainstream Weekly

At Stake : National Interest

SC — 2007-08-11T18:41:48Z

The Left parties have come out with a fairly detailed critique of the bilateral Indo-US “123” Agreement constituting the basis of the civilian nuclear cooperation deal between the two countries. Its text is being presented in this issue for the benefit of our readers. It will be transparent from the text that the charge of the Left being “paranoid” when it comes to cooperation with the US—a point repeatedly made by sections of the media euphoric about the nuclear accord—is not only (…)

- August 11, 2007

Need to Develop Close Ties with Eurasian Centre of Power

2007-08-11T18:40:26Z

While attention is currently rivetted on the Indo-US nuclear deal it is necessary to understand certain developments in our neighbourhood to which New Delhi has lately paid scant attention. One of these is the functioning of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO): its growing potential promotes the stability and security of not just Central Asia but the adjoining regions as well. Furthermore, it serves to impart a kind of balance in the situation obtaining in the Asia-Pacific as a (…)

- August 11, 2007

Left Parties' Statement: On the Indo-US Bilateral Nuclear Cooperation Agreement

2007-08-11T18:39:11Z

The Left parties have consistently held that the nuclear cooperation agreement should not be seen in isolation from the overall strategic tie-up with the United States. The nuclear cooperation deal is an integral part of the July 2005 Joint Statement, which has political, economic and strategic aspects. It is also closely linked to the June 2005 Military Framework Agreement signed with the United States.
It is therefore not possible to view the text of the bilateral “123” Agreement (…)

- August 11, 2007

This Business of a US-India Nuclear Deal

2007-08-11T18:35:48Z

IIn his farewell address on January 17, 1961, President Dwight D. Eisenhower delivered the prophetic warning:
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.
He was talking of the influence of the complex (for which his epithet was to prove enduring) in Washington's corridors of power.
We in India had to wait until the second term of a distant successor with very different (…)

- August 11, 2007

India-US Nuclear Deal : A Few Hard Questions

2007-08-11T18:33:32Z

Even if it is agreed that the Indo-US nuclear deal is a “historic” agreement, reflective of a path-breaking step taken by New Delhi and Washington, one cannot remain oblivious of its limitations as well as disadvantages. A reading of the text of the 123 Agreement, unveiled earlier this month, compels one to regard it more as a symbol of the United States' carrot-and-stick policy being exercised towards India than their diplomatic warmth. On page one itself, the 22-page text refers to the two (…)

- August 11, 2007

Arms Salesmanship

2007-08-11T18:31:45Z

The USA has a whole battery of Think Tanks with enormous amount of materials at their disposal. And these Think Tanks are supposed to help in the moulding of public opinion and government policies.
And yet when it come to the actual application of policies, the Clinton Administration has been displaying an amazing lack of coherent thinking and mature understanding of the impact of its policies on the world abroad. It has hardly covered itself with glory in Somalia nor has Bosnia added a (…)

- August 11, 2007

Human Rights in the Time of Patriotism

2007-08-11T18:29:21Z

Framing Geelani, Hanging Afzal: Patriotism in the Time of Terror by Nandita Haksar; Promilla & Co. Publishers in association with Bibliophile South Asia, New Delhi; pp. 348; Rs 450.
Nandita Haksar, human rights activist, who has confronted the Union and several State governments in Courts of law in cases of unspeakable atrocities, particularly in the North-Eastern parts of India, has authored an extremely engaging and challenging book. Although the two individuals who are its main (…)

- August 11, 2007

How Taiwan is the Taiwanese?

2007-08-11T18:26:16Z

The identities of people are shaped by the experiences they share as a common group over a period of time. Every nation has its own set of historical and political experiences that sets it apart from other nations. It is these experiences that make nations and its people feel unique and different as compared to others. The same logic holds true in the case of Taiwan and China as well. The Taiwanese have had a different set of experiences as compared to their Mainland counterparts and as a (…)

- August 11, 2007

Possibility of Free Trade and Identity of Nations

2007-08-11T18:24:24Z

When trade originated in some parts of the world, especially between parts of the traditional markets and fast-developing Europe, there emerged fresh technologies of production for goods and some amount of services. At that point of time, those primarily engaged in agriculture were exchanging goods from Europe, which had a different modus operandi. Though the exchange of certain goods from the agrarian markets of the reasonably weaker parts of the world occurred with different markets having (…)

- August 11, 2007